From Conflict to Peacebuilding: How Cultural, Structural and Direct Violence Affect Extremist Thoughts
Keywords:
Structural, Culture, Direct Violence, Extremist, Thoughts, PeacebuildingAbstract
The research article explores the role of direct, structural and cultural means of violence, and Galtung’s perspective regarding conflict and stopping peacebuilding in global terrorism areas. Qualitative research and scientific literature review methodology were used to collect data from different databases and websites. The paper found that direct, structural, and cultural violence is increasing conflict, and it is also essential for resolving the complexity of conflict in the global terrorism agenda. As a result, the research inferences that Galtung’s viewpoint underscores the need for a comprehensive strategy for peacebuilding. The interrelated forms of direct, structural, and cultural means of violence can cause terrorism and deter peace in the global society. The international peacemaker should develop a holistic approach to control direct, structural, and cultural means of violent effects of worldwide terrorism and attain enduring stability in terrorist-impacted areas.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Review of Crime, Peace & Society
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the term of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits the users to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the article in any medium provided that the authors are the original creators and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes, i.e., is attributed to research or educational use and the work is also properly cited.